As long as you're sure there *is* something, rather than nothing... anyway
I will have a look, as usual when I have time.

On 23 October 2014 06:09, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On 22 Oct 2014, at 17:33, meekerdb wrote:
>
>  On 10/22/2014 1:33 AM, Peter Sas wrote:
>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> Here is a blog piece I wrote about nothing as the ultimate source of
>>> being:
>>>
>>> http://critique-of-pure-interest.blogspot.nl/2014/09/
>>> why-is-there-something-rather-than.html
>>>
>>
>> I think you are too quick here:
>>
>> "It seems the subjective interpretation can be ruled out from the start.
>> Logic may be just subjective, being no more than the inherent structure of
>> human thought. But as such it cannot declare the necessity of existence. It
>> is absurd and indeed circular to say that there must be being since we
>> cannot imagine it otherwise. The circularity of such a proposal follows
>> from the fact that we ourselves, after all, are part of being, so on this
>> proposal we exist because we cannot imagine ourselves as not existing. In
>> such a scenario, then, we would be causa sui, since we would have imagined
>> or thought ourselves into existence. But this is plainly absurd."
>>
>> First, we can imagine ourselves as not existing.
>>
>
> We can do that in the third person way, like we can imagine ourself to be
> in Washington *and* Moscow. But we can't imagine ourselves as non existing
> in the first person sense. It is meaningless from that first person point
> of view. isn't it? Life, topologically, is an "open set", because
> (absolute) dying (if that exists) can't be a life experience. No Diary can
> ever contained a genuine, non poetical account, of not existing.
> There is a nice poetical account by Italo Calvino "The Nonexistent
> Knight", (Le chevalier inexistant), though.
>
>
>
>  Second, what you call the "subjective interpretation" I would take to be
>> the anthropic interpretation: We can only ponder this question if we exist,
>> so we necessarily find being.
>>
>
> We find consciousness, but that is at least a form of "being", OK. It is
> Descartes' cogito. If I understand you correctly. We only learn to bet on
> more and It get anthropic, or Turing-Löb-tropic assuming comp, by computer
> science, indeed only by arithmetical relations. But that must be shown
> equivalent with some Everett-tropic QM.
>
> Physics is a sum on all computations. It has to be sigma_1 complete (if
> only to have computers) but it might be more than sigma_1 complete, and in
> all case, the truth *about* the sigma_1 complete entities escapes all
> possible theories. Even "divine theories" like with oracle for a Pi_142
> complete problem.
>
> The mathematical logicians have discovered the abyss between the
> arithmetical reality of the structure (N, +, *)  and all possible effective
> theories, (notably by showing that it incarnates all possible behaviors of
> all universal machines).
>
> Bruno
>
>
>
>> Brent
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
>
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to