Zibbsey, you write amazingly like Hibbsa. On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:04 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> At the moment goofy theories abound, typically that divide into infinity > structures which derive according to whatever is needed for whatever is the > centre piece theory to pass muster. Typically, screen out the infinity > section and what's left just isn't becoming of someone given a desk and a > job for life entrusted with our most precious incumbent knowledge. The > custodians are they who must comprehend value that is there, and through > that understand the properties and continuation, levels of applicability, > the continuation of the necessary meat and potatoes of a scientific > civilization. To compare, to measure, to design, to predict, to solve > dynamical, material, fluidphysical stresses and limits, through structures > and transports, scales...all the same but now better...some new dimension > causing complexity collapses maybe, that new theory explains is because > symmetrical equates to a region that is redundant at this scale, that > wasn't at the scale above. > > You know, something a true scientific breakthrough theory would simply > deliver. Something mind boggling before, like emergence, suddenly > understood as something very simple and invariant that doesn't explain > emergence or talk about levels or scales, because all of that is about to > be > > > On Wednesday, October 15, 2014 1:14:46 AM UTC+1, Stephen Paul King wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I re-read S. Mitra's paper >> <http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fpdf%2F0902.3825v2.pdf&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNFnc0z9SwLW-HfdQv80vaf6sf0heg> >> again and it made more sense than before if I assumed that the reversible >> measurement idea is to be taken as a local reversal to the "direction of >> entropy flow" in an area and not the entire universe. >> The trouble is this notion of locality. Are there any favorite >> definitions of "locality" out there? AFAIK, it does not have a fixed size >> in space, but may have a fixed size in "space-time" as location information >> expands at the speed of light if we ignore the effects of local structure >> that would modulate decoherence. This "decoherence" thing, IMHO, needs to >> be looked at carefully. >> In deference to Bruno, I should ask a question relevant to the ongoing >> discussions. Is a finite universe with locally reversible time consistent >> as a 1p world? >> >> -- >> >> Kindest Regards, >> >> Stephen Paul King >> >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
