Hi Zibbsey, A new discovery for you. A computer can be a topological shape! A sector of the structures that are invariant under dilations in Sub-Riemannian manifolds is identical to the Lambda calculus. This can be said to imply that spatial relations can "carry" information just as well as sequences of binary symbols.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:04 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > At the moment goofy theories abound, typically that divide into infinity > structures which derive according to whatever is needed for whatever is the > centre piece theory to pass muster. Typically, screen out the infinity > section and what's left just isn't becoming of someone given a desk and a > job for life entrusted with our most precious incumbent knowledge. The > custodians are they who must comprehend value that is there, and through > that understand the properties and continuation, levels of applicability, > the continuation of the necessary meat and potatoes of a scientific > civilization. To compare, to measure, to design, to predict, to solve > dynamical, material, fluidphysical stresses and limits, through structures > and transports, scales...all the same but now better...some new dimension > causing complexity collapses maybe, that new theory explains is because > symmetrical equates to a region that is redundant at this scale, that > wasn't at the scale above. > > You know, something a true scientific breakthrough theory would simply > deliver. Something mind boggling before, like emergence, suddenly > understood as something very simple and invariant that doesn't explain > emergence or talk about levels or scales, because all of that is about to > be > > > On Wednesday, October 15, 2014 1:14:46 AM UTC+1, Stephen Paul King wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I re-read S. Mitra's paper >> <http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fpdf%2F0902.3825v2.pdf&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNFnc0z9SwLW-HfdQv80vaf6sf0heg> >> again and it made more sense than before if I assumed that the reversible >> measurement idea is to be taken as a local reversal to the "direction of >> entropy flow" in an area and not the entire universe. >> The trouble is this notion of locality. Are there any favorite >> definitions of "locality" out there? AFAIK, it does not have a fixed size >> in space, but may have a fixed size in "space-time" as location information >> expands at the speed of light if we ignore the effects of local structure >> that would modulate decoherence. This "decoherence" thing, IMHO, needs to >> be looked at carefully. >> In deference to Bruno, I should ask a question relevant to the ongoing >> discussions. Is a finite universe with locally reversible time consistent >> as a 1p world? >> >> -- >> >> Kindest Regards, >> >> Stephen Paul King >> >> >> -- Kindest Regards, Stephen Paul King Senior Researcher Mobile: (864) 567-3099 [email protected] http://www.provensecure.us/ “This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may be constituted as attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, notify sender immediately and delete this message immediately.” -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
