Sent from AOL Mobile Mail
I don't think it's just my opinion it's observation shows that most often governments to do a poor job . Plus point of my commentary is fat or regulations not solve this problem. If we were to listen to rapidly develop replacement energy systems like that we could! This will obviate the need for further regulations. Suspicious of those want regulations of United States of the and don't care about the rest of the world polluting. Libertarianism is just a method and not a goal. If big government mindset can achieve results or should I oppose? -----Original Message----- From: meekerdb <[email protected]> To: everything-list <[email protected]> Sent: Sat, Dec 13, 2014 11:57 AM Subject: Re: real A.I. <div id="AOLMsgPart_2_6ca3fc12-7240-474c-9304-679bdb2a8475"> <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000" class="aolReplacedBody"> <div class="aolmail_moz-cite-prefix"> On 12/13/2014 3:05 AM, spudboy100 via Everything List wrote: <blockquote cite="about:blank"> <font color="black" face="arial" size="2"> Its taking a problem, like global warming, and exaggerating that problem, so as to impose regulation. Its regulation, as the power to control. You want to fight global warming, then invent and distribute better energy systems. This is not being done in a truly, sincere, way, otherwise we'd have seen tens of billions of dollars, per year, funding alternate energy, rather than a few billion. Paltry. What has been demanded is regulation. Doing things this way doesn't indicate rushing to fix a problem, but rushing to regulate the US. </font> </blockquote> The "regulation" has been carbon tax and carbon emission trading, i.e. economic incentives to push the market into investing in alternative energy. It's part of U.S. libertarian dogma that the government cannot do anything right, all regulation is evil, and the market is always the solution. <blockquote cite="about:blank"> <font color="black" face="arial" size="2"> My prediction is that in the US,with the handing of the power to regulate to the UN, you'd see a back-reaction, against the political elites, that champion regulations, and not funding research sufficiently. The oil and coal companies that are despised, would then win, handily. </font> </blockquote> What do you mean "then", they're winning handily now. Brent <p></p> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to <a target="_blank" href="mailto:[email protected]";>[email protected]</a>. To post to this group, send email to <a target="_blank" href="mailto:[email protected]";>[email protected]</a>. Visit this group at <a target="_blank" href="http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list";>http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list</a>. For more options, visit <a target="_blank" href="https://groups.google.com/d/optout";>https://groups.google.com/d/optout</a>. </div> </div> </div> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
