Brent, Hindus are not on a campaign worldwide to ensure their rule. Today its
the Muslims, tomorrow it may be the Hawaiian shirt wearers. The communists were
the biggest mass murderers in human history, in part due to the fact they spent
so much effort slaughtering their own people, unlike the Nazis, the Aztecs,
the Conquistadores, who spent so much time slaughtering others. The Islamists
come in even-steven with massacring outsiders (qufar-infidels) and also wish to
destroy each other, Sunni v Shia, etc.
So what to do?
-----Original Message-----
From: meekerdb <[email protected]>
To: everything-list <[email protected]>
Sent: Sun, Jan 18, 2015 5:08 pm
Subject: Re: Why was nobody murdered because of this cartoon?
On 1/18/2015 10:03 AM, spudboy100 via Everything List wrote:
Because its not part of the party line is why. It's the ideology of
progies to enable the jihad attacks against the west, perhaps so as
to winnow down the forces of resistance, via Islamist attacks, and
thus, get the party worldwide into power, placed their by
beleaguered votes? Paranoid indeed, but it kind of makes sense.
I observe a empirical fact, Muslims behave like homicidal
imbeciles when their religion is insulted, but Christians and Jews
and Hindus and Buddhist do not.Why the difference? It is a
perfectly legitimate question.
John K Clark
-----Original Message-----
From: John Clark <[email protected]>
To: everything-list <[email protected]>
Sent: Sat, Jan 17, 2015 4:31 pm
Subject: Re: Why was nobody murdered because of this cartoon?
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:33 PM, PGC
<[email protected]> wrote:
>> A fair question.
>I'm not so sure about that. The question
presupposes ironically that violence is a
justified response to insult.
I observe a empirical fact, Muslims behave like homicidal
imbeciles when their religion is insulted, but Christians
and Jews and Hindus and Buddhist do not.Why the difference?
It is a perfectly legitimate question.
Of course it is not all Muslims who become homicidal, only a small
number; yet certainly a much larger proportion than among those other
religions. But the Tamil Tigers are Hindu and have engaged in suicide
bombing and other terrorist acts. Christians and Jews certainly also in
different times. Buddhist and Jains and Quakers not so much.
Atheists...depends on how you count Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot. I don't think
they had their 'religion' insulted; they just wanted power, but that might
be true of imams too. I think the important difference is Muslims have been
marginalized by the advance of technological civilization and the
Enlightenment. So disaffected young men, like the Kouchai brothers, see
fighting for Islam as a worthy and noble venture to give meaning to their
lives, without having give it themselves. By comparison, fighting for
communism would have been attractive in the 50's but is passe now. Fighting
for Capitalism makes no sense because Capitalism is dominant.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
