On 2/19/2015 5:34 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:59 PM, meekerdb <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On 2/19/2015 3:52 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Thursday, February 19, 2015, meekerdb <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> I think it's taking the mathematics too seriously (but then I'm not a
Platonist). When QM is integrated with GR something different may emerge.
>
So which interpretation do you prefer? Presumably one that takes the math
less
seriously.
The point is to not prefer one but to wait for more evidence or better theories.
Science, unlike practical pursuits, doesn't require a decision.
Ahh so now you see why a hyperintelligent entity might stall forever before
deciding to act.
I always saw that any intelligent agent might stall forever before deciding on SOME
things. But decisions about acts include the cost of not deciding which is usually
non-zero and time-dependent.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
