From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of LizR

 

The Fermi paradox gets sharper.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1504.03418

This makes it even more important that we don’t blow it on our own little 
world. Or perhaps it is evidence that *we are going to blow it* just like every 
other species has on every other star that has developed intelligence. Our 
current race towards global war certainly seems to indicate that the second 
hypothesis has merit.

Why have we failed to detect any signs of civilization outside of our own 
earth? 

On the one hand we have only looked at a very few stars (for short periods of 
time), but surveys such as this seem to indicate either that civilization 
either does not go down the road of maximum energy use within its host galaxy; 
hence no signature, or that no such civilization exists (though they did 
suggest a few galaxies worth further study)

Perhaps at some level of intelligence  growth in energy consumption no longer 
appeals. Why assume that a super advanced civilization would go down the route  
of creating Dyson spheres around every star in its galaxy, which is what the 
study was surveying for. Perhaps at some level of intelligence other things 
become more important than consuming more and more energy to effect the 
physical world through the application of energy. I have a few observations 
about the study: it  did not eliminate civilizations that transformed under 50% 
of the stars in their galaxy into dyson spheres. I am thinking that a galactic 
scale civilization might refrain from scaling out to complete Dysonization of 
its galaxy for esthetic reasons for example. If say they had transformed the 
most promising 10% of the stars in a galaxy into dyson spheres that would still 
be a huge number of such mega-energy-producing engines, generating 
unconceivable amounts of power. Why would any civilization need more than ay 20 
billion Dyson sphere in its domain? That would be 10% in a galaxy with 200 
billion stars in it.

Even a single dyson sphere is a mind boggling amount of energy. 20 billionn 
such spheres prinkled around the galaxy is 20 billion times more mind boggling. 
I think it is fair to question the assumption that a civilization would even 
want to blink out every star in the sky in order to maximize the usable energy 
yield from those suns.

Purely riffing on a speculative vein here… 

Chris

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to