On Thursday, June 18, 2015, John Clark <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015  Stathis Papaioannou <[email protected]
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote:
>
>
>> >>> "You" are the person reading this sentence
>>>
>>>
>>> >> OK, but then it would be meaningless to talk about what "you" will do
>>> tomorrow because "you" will not be reading that sentence tomorrow.  So if
>>> Stathis Papaioannou wants to talk about the future Stathis Papaioannou if
>>> going to need a better definition of continuity; John Clark thinks a good
>>> one would be the person (or people) who remember reading that sentence
>>> right then, and in Many Worlds that would be lots and lots of people.
>>>
>>
>> > There is an illusion that I am a unique individual persisting through
>> time,
>>
>
> How would things be different if it were not an illusion? It's silly to
> try to explain consciousness by saying it's another subjective thing like
> illusion unless it can be objectively explained how that illusion is
> generated; I think the key to it is memory, if Stathis Papaioannou of today
> remembers being Stathis Papaioannou yesterday then Stathis Papaioannou of
> today gives Stathis Papaioannou yesterday the title  "I".
>
>
>> > even if I know that there will be multiple versions of me in future. I
>> hope that I will become one of the versions with good experiences rather
>> than bad experiences.
>>
>
> But that implies that only one of those versions deserves the title of
> "I", and that is untrue.
>

And that's why it's an illusion.


-- 
Stathis Papaioannou

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to