John, isn't there a Buddhist saying by the Buddha, "If the Buddha stands in 
your path (spiritual) strike him down"? 



-----Original Message-----
From: John Clark <[email protected]>
To: everything-list <[email protected]>
Sent: Tue, Dec 27, 2016 3:36 pm
Subject: Re: An invisible fuzzy amoral mindless blob, aka God



On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:








​> ​
My God, as you call it, is a testable theory, since physics is derived from a 
internal modal variant of self-reference. I derived formally a quantum logic, 
and explained informally how we get the statistical interference.





​A derivation using dozens of pronouns that either have no clear referent or 
are logically contradictory. But I believe we may have been through this 
before.​
 
 


​> ​
the Aristotelian theology fails.





​To hell with the ancient Greeks!​
 




​> ​
God is used in the philosophers sense: the primary cause,




The
​ ​
primary cause
​ may be attached to the word  "God", but we both know that is not the only 
attachment, ​so is "a being who can think".
 


 
​> ​
which is the god of the platonist.


 

​To hell with the ancient Greeks!​
 



 


​>​
You talk like if scientists have solved the problem, but it has not.





​You talk as if theologians have solved the problem, but they have not.​
 
 


 
​> ​
(either Plato's God, or even Pythagoras" God





​To hell with the ancient Greeks!​
 
 



​> ​
In theology, the greeks were





​To hell with the ancient Greeks!​
 




​> ​
Don't confuse the first god of Aristotle (usually called God), the second God 
of Aristotle
​. ​
(Primary Matter), the god of Plato (first principle) and the god of Pythagoras 
(the natural numbers).





​OK I won't confuse it, and I'll avoid confusion by ignoring both. ​
 
​To hell with the ancient Greeks!​
 
 


​> ​
two beers in the fridge is not rsponsible for the numbers 2 to exist 
physically, and here





​If there were nobody around to think about the number 2 and if there were not 
2 of anything in the entire physical universe, then would the number 2 exist? 
And if it did, how would things be different if it didn't?​





​> ​
you beg the question by assuming the second god of Aristotle.




 
To hell with the ancient Greeks!​
 
 


 
​> ​
It is the favorite gods of the catholics.





​I'll say this for the catholics, their view of God is clear, clearly wrong but 
clear nevertheless. Your view of God isn't even wrong.​
 




​> ​
The correct arithmetical relations implements all computations




​And all correct computations ​
​need matter that obeys the laws of physics. ​For some reason I'm feeling Deja 
Vu right now, I can't imagine why.





​> ​
 Nobody is interested in 2+2=5.





​Well you sure as hell better be interested in incorrect calculations if you 
want to avoid them! So I ask yet again , how can you, how can even God separate 
correct numerical relations from incorrect ones without the help of matter that 
obeys the laws of physics?​ You can't do it I can't do it and God can't do it.

 

​> ​
With mechanism, we have the good theory of consciousness,



​Everybody has a theory on consciousness and none of them are worth a damn, I'd 
be much more interested in a theory of intelligence. ​
 





​>> ​
God must be able to think or the word becomes a joke.







​> ​
That shows only how much you take for granted the brainwashing of the clericals.




​Well, I may be brainwashed but according to you 
​I'm smarter than God because I can think and God can't.​




​> ​
You Sir, are more catholic than the Pope,




Wow, calling a guy known for disliking religion religious, never heard that one 
before, at least I never heard it before I was 12.  




​ John K Clark​















-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to