On 28 Dec 2016, at 08:08, Brent Meeker wrote:



On 12/27/2016 4:18 PM, spudboy100 via Everything List wrote:
John, isn't there a Buddhist saying by the Buddha, "If the Buddha stands in your path (spiritual) strike him down"?



<abfnkejcccoakbhn.png>

Brent




Yes, another koan zen or buddhist say that we have to kill all the buddhas, and is usually understood as a warning against argument per authority.

It is common among mystics that they encourage the *personal* inquiry, a bit like mathematicians who recommend the personal understanding of (most) theorems.

Platonist can go farer when taking argument from nature as treachery. We cab use nature to refute a theory, but we have to find the theory by reflexion and not copy nature ...

Bruno













-----Original Message-----
From: John Clark <[email protected]>
To: everything-list <[email protected]>
Sent: Tue, Dec 27, 2016 3:36 pm
Subject: Re: An invisible fuzzy amoral mindless blob, aka God

On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:

​> ​ My God, as you call it, is a testable theory, since physics is derived from a internal modal variant of self-reference. I derived formally a quantum logic, and explained informally how we get the statistical interference.

​A derivation using dozens of pronouns that either have no clear referent or are logically contradictory. But I believe we may have been through this before.​

​> ​ the Aristotelian theology fails.

​To hell with the ancient Greeks!​

​> ​ God is used in the philosophers sense: the primary cause,

The ​ ​ primary cause ​ may be attached to the word "God", but we both know that is not the only attachment, ​so is "a being who can think".

​> ​ which is the god of the platonist.

​To hell with the ancient Greeks!​


​>​ You talk like if scientists have solved the problem, but it has not.

​You talk as if theologians have solved the problem, but they have not.​

​> ​ (either Plato's God, or even Pythagoras" God

​To hell with the ancient Greeks!​

​> ​ In theology, the greeks were

​To hell with the ancient Greeks!​

​> ​ Don't confuse the first god of Aristotle (usually called God), the second God of Aristotle ​. ​ (Primary Matter), the god of Plato (first principle) and the god of Pythagoras (the natural numbers).

​OK I won't confuse it, and I'll avoid confusion by ignoring both. ​ ​To hell with the ancient Greeks!​

​> ​ two beers in the fridge is not rsponsible for the numbers 2 to exist physically, and here

​If there were nobody around to think about the number 2 and if there were not 2 of anything in the entire physical universe, then would the number 2 exist? And if it did, how would things be different if it didn't?​

​> ​ you beg the question by assuming the second god of Aristotle.

  To hell with the ancient Greeks!​

​> ​ It is the favorite gods of the catholics.

​I'll say this for the catholics, their view of God is clear, clearly wrong but clear nevertheless. Your view of God isn't even wrong.​

​> ​ The correct arithmetical relations implements all computations

​And all correct computations ​ ​need matter that obeys the laws of physics. ​For some reason I'm feeling Deja Vu right now, I can't imagine why.

​> ​  Nobody is interested in 2+2=5.

​Well you sure as hell better be interested in incorrect calculations if you want to avoid them! So I ask yet again , how can you, how can even God separate correct numerical relations from incorrect ones without the help of matter that obeys the laws of physics?​ You can't do it I can't do it and God can't do it.

​> ​ With mechanism, we have the good theory of consciousness,

​Everybody has a theory on consciousness and none of them are worth a damn, I'd be much more interested in a theory of intelligence. ​

​>> ​ God must be able to think or the word becomes a joke.

​> ​ That shows only how much you take for granted the brainwashing of the clericals.

​Well, I may be brainwashed but according to you ​I'm smarter than God because I can think and God can't.​

​> ​ You Sir, are more catholic than the Pope,

Wow, calling a guy known for disliking religion religious, never heard that one before, at least I never heard it before I was 12.

​ John K Clark​





--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to everything- [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to everything- [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to