On 11/07/2017 2:12 pm, Russell Standish wrote:
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:29:26PM +1000, Bruce Kellett wrote:
I don't think it is that simple. If we have substrate independence,
the machine (the conscious person) cannot tell what substrate is
supporting the computations, whether arithmetic, a quantum world, or
a classical Newtonian world. That would seem to imply that mere
consideration of conscious observer moments cannot distinguish
between these. Or else you feel the full force of the conundrum
enunciated above: if observer moments imply a quantum reality, then
the machine can indeed determine its substrate, and substrate
independence is lost.

You're still missing the point. The quantum reality is a 1p thing, it
is the observed phenomenal physics. Substrate independence is a 3p
thing, and may be quantum, classical or whatever, just needing to
support universal computation.

Well, in the Everettian picture, the quantum reality is the whole structure, multiverse or whatever. The 0p/3p picture of splitting into separate worlds according to the unitary evolution of the wave function is the quantum reality. The 1p view of this is just a projection from the whole according to self-selection. If the universe were classical, Turing machines could still exist and support the computations underlying consciousness, but there would be no splitting into many worlds. So if consciousness implies quantum mechanics, then we are able to determine the substrate -- if quantum, the substrate cannot be purely Newtonian, and the computations are not supported by a classical Turing machine. I don't think the 1p-1pp-3p distinctions are helpful here, they obscure what is actually going on.

Bruce





--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to