On 21 Nov 2017, at 21:57, John Clark wrote:
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 1:36 AM, Bruce Kellett <[email protected]
> wrote:
. >> Does non locality mean the future influences the past as
Clark alleged?
> No.
"realism plus arrow of time preservation and quantum mechanics
are not compatible. In other words, quantum mechanics cannot be
completed with any (local or non-local) hidden variables, provide we
assume the common sense of the arrow of time."
https://arxiv.org/abs/0806.2037
Interesting, but again, that paper assume one world, and use some
notion of simultaneous (space-like separated) outcomes, which I am not
even sure can make any sense in a relativistic quantum mechanics
(without collapse).
My feeling is that Everett relative state theory prevents "non-
locality" to make any sense in realms which mix special (and general)
relativity.
Bruno
John K Clark
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
