On Saturday, November 25, 2017 at 2:19:48 PM UTC-6, [email protected] wrote: > > > > If the ensemble's distribution changes as a consequence of changes in the > wf, IMO there is reason to believe the wf has ontic properties. That's all > I was alleging. AG >
ψ-ontology is not consistent with locality, so there can't be causal rules involved with measurement outcomes. Ontology does not buy you what you might be thinking. ψ-epistemology is not commensurate with classical reality, and so there is some need for a classical observer or measurement system. This then makes ψ-epistemology not consistent with locality. LC -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
