On 12/10/2017 9:26 AM, John Clark wrote:
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 2:15 AM, <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>wrote:
>
The fundamental unproven assumption, and IMO the core fallacy of
the MWI, is the belief that what CAN occur, necessarily MUST will
occur.
The
fundamental
assumption of the MWI is that the
Schrodinger
Wave
Equation
means what it says and says what it means. The
fundamental
assumption
of Copenhagen is that
Schrodinger
forgot to put a "except" and a "however" into his equation.
Copenhagen observes that there must be a stable irreversible record of
observations in order that there be science. Born guessed that the
squared modulus of the state-vector represent the probabilities of
different measurement outcomes. Gleason showed this is the only
possibility.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
