On Wednesday, December 13, 2017 at 2:21:24 AM UTC, John Clark wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 3:45 PM, <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
> wrote:
>
> ​>
> ​>>​
> ​
> The fundamental unproven assumption, and IMO the core fallacy of the MWI, 
> is the belief that what CAN occur, necessarily MUST will occur.
>
>
> ​>> ​
> The
> ​ ​
> fundamental
> ​ ​
> assumption of the MWI is that the
> ​ ​
> Schrodinger 
> ​Wave
>  
> ​Equation
>  means what it says and says what it means. The ​
> ​
> fundamental
> ​ ​
> assumption
> ​ of Copenhagen is that ​
> Schrodinger
> ​ forgot to put a "except" and a "however" into his equation.​
>
>
> ​> ​
> Solutions of the SWE give the probabilities of getting possible 
> measurement outcomes
>
>
> ​It's not the SWE itself that gives the probabilities, 
>

I know. That's why I wrote "solutions" of the SWE. AG
 

> you've got to 
> square of the absolute value of the wave
> ​ 
> function
> ​ ​
> ​to find the probability ​
> of 
> ​finding ​
> a particle at 
> ​that​
>  point
> ​. 
>

You mean Born's rule? Never heard of it. Wasn't covered in my graduate 
courses in QM. AG
 

> I'm not splitting hairs this is important because 
> the SWE contains
> ​ 
> imaginary numbers (square root of -1) so 2 very different wave functions 
> can yield the exact same probability at a point when you square it. So even 
> if you know the probability you can't know the unique wave function that 
> produced it because there is no such unique function.
>

Maybe at discrete points, and even if not, why is this important? AG 

>
> ​> ​
> prior to the measurement. If you want to give the equation a life after 
> measurement
> ​ [...]
>
>
> ​If you want to say the equation has no life after measurement then you're 
> going to have to explain exactly what a measurement is and what term in the 
> SWE it interacts with causing it to self destruct.
>

The measurement process, whatever its details are, is the same in MWI as in 
Copenhagen regardless of your denials. I can speculate what happens to the 
SWE after measurement, but more important I don't see why MWI implies MW, 
and you have NOT made that case. AG

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to