On Friday, April 6, 2018 at 4:04:55 PM UTC, [email protected] wrote: > > > > On Friday, April 6, 2018 at 2:45:40 PM UTC, Lawrence Crowell wrote: >> >> On Thursday, April 5, 2018 at 3:20:39 PM UTC-5, [email protected] >> wrote: >>> >>> Assuming that QM is a non-local theory, if two systems become entangled, >>> say via a measurement, do they necessary have a non-local connection? That >>> is, does entanglement necessarily imply non-locality? AG >>> >> >> Entanglement is a form of nonlocality. >> >> LC >> > > OK, that's what I thought, but consider this. It's clear that information > can't be transmitted due to entanglement or non locality. But aren't we > entangled with the external world, yet receive information from it? TIA, AG >
Or look at it this way; if I am NOT entangled with the photons coming my way allowing me to SEE the world, and NOT entangled with the various pressure waves that enable me to hear and feel the world, what I am entangled with? TIA, AG -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
