On Saturday, May 19, 2018 at 5:29:33 AM UTC, Brent wrote: > > > > On 5/18/2018 10:14 PM, [email protected] <javascript:> wrote: > > > *So why don't you draw the obvious inference? If those other worlds don't > exist -- which if I can read English has been your passionate position all > along -- then quantum measurements in this world, the only world, are > statistical and hence NOT reversible in principle. AG* > > >> but it is different in each branch of the wave function, so reversing >> this branch does nothing for the others, and does not restore the original >> superposition. Thus the process is irreversible in principle (nomologically >> irreversible -- to reverse violates the laws of physics). >> > > *But if those other worlds don't exist, it makes no sense whatever to rely > on them to establish irreversible in principle in this world (as > distinguished from statistically irreversible or irreversible FAPP). It > seems you want to have it both ways; that many worlds really don't exist. > but quantum measurements in this world are irreversible in principle due > the existence of many worlds. AG* > > > You don't handle uncertainty well, do you. > > Brent >
You know, it's not a perfect analogy, but I don't believe that when I pull the one arm bandit with 64 million possible outcomes, that 64 million (minus one) worlds are created, each with an identical copy of me, getting those other outcomes. What do you believe? AG -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
