On Saturday, May 26, 2018 at 5:08:51 AM UTC, Brent wrote: > > > > On 5/25/2018 9:50 PM, [email protected] <javascript:> wrote: > > *Right. I was just making the observation that when we don't see advanced > EM waves (coming from the future?), it's generally not seen as a big deal > and they're ignored. But when decoherence or the MWI implies the creation > of full-blown worlds (that we can't observe), there seems to be a large > body of opinion that accepts this bizarre result without serious criticism > that there's no mechanism or process for creating full-blown worlds. No. I > don't believe in such worlds. I tend to think a large segment of > professional physicists have gone mad. AG* > > > Except you've got it backwards. There is a mechanism and process for > creating them FAPP, evolution by the Schroedinger equation, which is the > same process used in predicting results. But there is no physical > mechanism for making them disappear....there's a mathematical process, i.e. > taking the partial trace which is the same as applying a projection > operator (with a little better justification). > > A large segment of professional physicists never heard of you. >
*Wrong. Everyone's heard of me. I am the Great Wizard of Oz, aka "AG". * > > Brent > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
