"The compulsion to replace the "simultaneous* happenings, as indicated directly by the theory,
--- Where does the theory assert this? I don't see this, and the usual suspects are silent. I suppose they can't stand the heat. I see that Peres is focused on how the complex amplitudes are estimated, not overtly relevant to my issue. AG by *alternatives*, of which the theory is supposed to indicate the respective *probabilities*, arises from the conviction that what we really observe are particles --- What has the observation of particles has to do with this issue? He says "of which the theory is supposed to indicate ... ." Is Erwin speaking out of both sides of his mouth? AG that actual events always concern particles, not waves." -Erwin Schroedinger --- SCERIR; IN YOU OWN WORDS; WHAT DO YOU BELIEVE AND WHY? AG -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
