On 8/17/2018 1:55 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 16 Aug 2018, at 20:48, Brent Meeker <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
On 8/16/2018 3:16 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 15 Aug 2018, at 21:29, Brent Meeker <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
On 8/15/2018 2:38 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 14 Aug 2018, at 20:09, Brent Meeker <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
On 8/14/2018 2:33 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
kicking back of the fact that we have to take account the wave structure
integrally.
If you read words metaphorically then you can make them mean anything.
The whole point is that the quantum wave is not a metaphor. That is what the
two slit experience, done with one particle at a time, illustrates.
Moving to instrumentalism is an option in applied physics. It is non sensical
in metaphysics.
On the contrary, it is a metaphysic.
As a metaphysics it is self-defeating as it leads to solipsism. Metaphysical
instrumentalism denies any non-observable reality, not even the dark side of
the moon.
No. That's strawmanning. "Observable" allows for indirect observation.
Observation is not the same as seeing.
Indirect observation needs extrapolation. You just interpret this in Aristotle
metaphysics which attribute a *fundamental* reality on what we see and that we
infer from that. But that is contradicted by the facts and the mechanist theory
of mind. You are invoking your God without saying, ITSME.
You attribute a fundamental reality to what you think. Perception is a
form of thinking.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.