On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 7:41:03 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > You can derive Schroedinger's equation (even Dirac’s equation) from > Feynman’s formulation. This should be intuitively obvious if you read > Feynman popular book on the Nature of Light. The waves are there. But yes: > the collapse does not make sense in Feynman’s formulation (or it looks even > more ad hoc and non covariant). That is a reason to disbelieve in the > collapse, but then you get some version of the many-world view (which you > dislike apparently). > > >
With Feynman (path integral, or sum over histories), instead of Many Worlds, you get Multiple Histories. - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_histories Spoiler alert: Only one history makes it out alive! Some physicists who can't believe in probabilities (stochasticity) - which they avoid like vampires avoid running water - like Many Worlds. - pt -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
