The leading term in time difference with radius is the g_{tt} component of 
the Schwarzschild metric


g_{00}(r) = 1 - 2GM/rc^2 


We have 2GM/c^2 = 0.0088m which is the Schwarzschild radius. From R to R' 
we can integrate this 


∫g_{00}(r) dr = R' - R - 2GM/c^2 ln(R'/R).


For R' = R + δr we can approximate this as


∫g_{00}(r) dr = δr - 2GM/c^2 δr/R = g_{00}(r)δr


We take R the radius of the Earth 6.4×10^6m and so we have 


2GM/c^2 δr/R = 1.38×10^{-9}δr


as the difference from δr in a flat space and the curved spacetime result 
from ∫g_{00}(r) dr. For a centimeter this is then 1.38×10^{-11}m. So the 
deviation from a Euclidean space result between R and R' is by this factor. 
Dividing by the speed of light gives a time deviation of 4.6×10^{-18}sec. 


The universe started 13.8 billion years ago and a year is 3.15×10^7sec so 
the universe has been around 4.35×10^{17}sec and so one second deviation 
since the start of the universe would be 2.3×10^{-18}, which is only half 
the result above.


LC

On Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 8:29:12 AM UTC-6, John Clark wrote:
>
> In yesterday's issue of the journal Nature Scientists at the National 
> Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) reported they have made a new 
> type of clock that is the most accurate ever, it's called a Ytterbium 
> Lattice Clock. It's about 100 times better than any previous clock, if set 
> at the time of the Big Bang 13.8 billion years ago today it would be off by 
> less than one second.
>
> https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0738-2
>
> It's so good the main source of error is due to General Relativity, if you 
> lift the clock up by just one centimeter the Earth's gravitational field is 
> slightly weaker and so the clock runs noticeably faster, that may be why 
> NIST is now working on a portable version of their Ytterbium Lattice Clock. 
> If GPS satellites had clocks this good they'd know where they were relative 
> to the Earth to within a centimeter and so could tell users on the ground 
> where they were within a centimeter; and that would be more than good 
> enough for jet fighters to automatically land on aircraft carriers without 
> a pilot, even at night in a heavy fog in a bad storm with the deck tossing 
> up and down. It would be by far the best instrument ever made to detect 
> tiny changes in the gravitational field, and that would make it much easier 
> to find things buried deep underground. The Earth just became more 
> transparent. It might even be used to detect Gravitational Waves and Dark 
> Matter.  
>
> John K Clark
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to