On Mon, Apr 29, 2019, at 21:08, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> 
> On Monday, April 29, 2019 at 8:41:18 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>> 
>>> On 26 Apr 2019, at 22:25, [email protected] wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Friday, April 26, 2019 at 2:04:31 AM UTC-5, Cosmin Visan wrote:
>>>>>>> Consciousness. Red is red.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Friday, 26 April 2019 10:03:26 UTC+3, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> What specific ontological entity or entities of any science in 2019 
>>>>>>>> does one claim as* final* - i.e., *that *ontology is the "true" one? 
>>>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Friday, April 26, 2019 at 11:25:15 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 26 Apr 2019, at 10:09, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> That is a good point.
>>>>> 
>>>>> And that is the basic framework of Strawsonian panpsychism:
>>>>> 
>>>>> *Consciousness Isn’t a Mystery. It’s Matter.*
>>>>> - 
>>>>> https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/16/opinion/consciousness-isnt-a-mystery-its-matter.html
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Yes, the believer in Ontological Matter can get that crazy. When they 
>>>> don’t eliminate consciousness, they identify it with matter, but then I 
>>>> have no more any idea what they mean by consciousness, nor matter. It like 
>>>> saying that apple are oranges, or that dogs are cats, or that music are 
>>>> black spot. 
>>>> 
>>>> To be sure, I have not read the text in the link, but I doubt it could 
>>>> clarify anything like that. Matter and consciousness are typically very 
>>>> different things. Consciousness is ascribed to person, matter is ascribed 
>>>> to their (local) bodies. Both exist phenomenologically, with digital 
>>>> mechanism, but one is far more general than the other, and once 
>>>> (consciousness) is responsible from creating, in some sense, the other 
>>>> (matter).
>>>> 
>>>> Consciousness needs only small numbers, matter needs the full invariance 
>>>> of consciousness on all “similar enough” computations, and use infinities 
>>>> (phenomenologically, as the ontology has not infinities). Matter obeys to 
>>>> the laws of physics, but consciousness obeys to the laws of mind (the laws 
>>>> of Boole and the laws of Boolos, as I sum up sometimes, that is classical 
>>>> logic + the laws of self-reference).
>>>> 
>>>> Bruno
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Matter - in the panpsychist view - obeys "the laws of physics", but those 
>>> "laws" are are an incomplete theory of matter.
>>> 
>>> There is a physical and psychical aspect to any complete theory of matter - 
>>> in the panpsychist view.
>>> 
>>> There may be an immaterialist science, and the pro-"matter" people may have 
>>> some 'splainin' to do, but in the panpsychist context, matter is both 
>>> physical and psychical.
>> 
>> The problem with panpsychism, is in “pan”, not in psychisme. Then I have no 
>> clue what it could mean that matter is psychical. With mechanism, matter is 
>> dreamed, never experienced. There is no matter per se.It cannot be 
>> psychical, because it cannot be, at all.
>> 
>> Bruno
>> 
> 
> Of
> 
>  "matter is dreamed" 
> 
>  or "matter [*the only basic substance**] possesses psychical properties"
> 
> the second seems more like science.

Yes, especially if you wear a white coat and hold a test tube with some 
bubbling green liquid while saying it.

Telmo.

> 
> * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panpsychism#Physicalism_and_materialism
> 
> @philipthrift
> 

> --
>  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
>  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
>  To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>  Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to