Not at all. As I already told you, for any claim of the form "X exists" (where in this case you assume X is something outside consciousness), "X exists" is actually a thought in consciousness, therefore X doesn't exist since it is just a confabulation of consciousness.
More than this, from phenomenological analysis, you get to the conclusion that the proper definition for the concept of "existence" is the looking-back-at-itself of self-reference, therefore existence can only by ontologically subjective, so consciousness is all there is. On Wednesday, 1 May 2019 01:48:52 UTC+3, Terren Suydam wrote: > > You're failing to see that consciousness is all we can *know. *You go too > far when you claim that it's all that *exists*. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
