On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 2:08 AM 'Cosmin Visan' < [email protected]> wrote:
*> Sorry dude, your ignorance doesn't stand for lack of evidence. There is > plenty of evidence. And I will not even bother showing it to a woo woo like > you.* > You are a stereotypical internet fool, a dime a dozen "expert" on consciousness. Paranormal research is a dead field that never advances, if this list existed in 1919 we'd be using the telegraph instead of the World Wide Web but other than that nothing would change, we'd be saying the same things because the evidence for the paranormal stuck in 1919 and it smells just as bad in 2019. In the last century we've weighed neutrinos, found the digital code for life, and detected gravitational waves, but not only have we failed to explain how paranormal stuff works we can't even show that there is something that needs explaining. And you don't need a 10 billion dollar particle accelerator to investigate the existence (or lack of existence) of the paranormal. If these simple easy experiments that crackpots like you claim are valid then today the paranormal would not be controversial because its existence would have been proven to everyone's satisfaction way back in the time of Newton (maybe in the time of Archimedes) and today high school kids, perhaps grade school kids, would be repeating these classic 17'th century experiments proving the existence of the paranormal in their science fair projects. But they're not. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv3-eq%2B1yO5SuXNvx6hCiykO5VjR_2WgFuQxa7SbqTh4fA%40mail.gmail.com.
