> On 11 May 2019, at 08:13, Philip Thrift <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> https://aeon.co/ideas/how-the-dualism-of-descartes-ruined-our-mental-health
> ...
> Nature was thereby drained of her inner life, rendered a deaf and blind 
> apparatus of indifferent and value-free law, and humankind was faced with a 
> world of inanimate, meaningless matter, upon which it projected its psyche – 
> its aliveness, meaning and purpose – only in fantasy.
> ...
> The bifurcation of mind and nature was at the root of immeasurable secular 
> progress –  medical and technological advance, the rise of individual rights 
> and social justice, to name just a few. It also protected us all from being 
> bound up in the inherent uncertainty and flux of nature. It gave us a certain 
> omnipotence – just as it gave science empirical control over nature – and 
> most of us readily accept, and willingly spend, the inheritance bequeathed by 
> it, and rightly so.
> 
> In the face of an indifferent and unresponsive world that neglects to render 
> our experience meaningful outside of our own minds  –  for 
> nature-as-mechanism is powerless to do this  –


Yes, nature does not even exist as mechanism, so the notion of 
“nature-as-mechanism” is globally non sensical, yet locally, it works for 
person supported by highly probable computations, but nature becomes a 
projection, like in a dream.




>  our minds have been left fixated on empty representations of a world that 
> was once its source and being.

That is due to the reductionist conception of machine and number. Today, we can 
defeat it, mathematically.




> All we have, if we are lucky to have them, are therapists and parents who try 
> to take on what is, in reality, and given the magnitude of the loss, an 
> impossible task.

The loss is due to the separation of theology from science, and the impeaching 
of the fundamental questioning for a long period. 
That has led to the separation of human sciences and exact science, making them 
both into pseudo-metaphysics and pseudo-religion. Then we see only the 
“superficial” technologies, without understanding of what they implies. To 
separate science and theologies is a con artist trick to steal your money, and 
in passing, your soul.

When “equated” with the machine, the negative pessimist will say, “oh damned I 
am only a machine”, but the positive optimistic will say, “nice, so machine can 
be as nice as I am”.

The interesting thing is only that this can be tested. Mechanism has observable 
consequences.

Bruno





> ...
> 
> "How did we ever get the notion of the mind as something distinct from the 
> body? Why did this bad idea enter our culture?”
> -- Richard Rorty
> https://news.stanford.edu/news/2005/april13/rorty-041305.html
> 
> 
> @philipthrift
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list 
> <https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/66ebf031-d9ed-4855-9151-7c5a214b0bd4%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/66ebf031-d9ed-4855-9151-7c5a214b0bd4%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/AE4C61A8-F191-4C24-85E8-815F6B138EFA%40ulb.ac.be.

Reply via email to