On Thursday, May 30, 2019 at 4:38:10 PM UTC-5, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Thursday, May 30, 2019 at 4:35:14 PM UTC-5, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, May 30, 2019 at 3:30:56 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5/30/2019 1:17 PM, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thursday, May 30, 2019 at 3:03:30 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote: 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 5/30/2019 11:47 AM, Tomas Pales wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thursday, May 30, 2019 at 8:02:12 PM UTC+2, Brent wrote: 
>>>>>
>>>>> I wonder if philosophers have noticed that properties can be separated 
>>>>> from objects in quantum mechanics, c.f. Cheshire Cat experiments?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> What does it mean that a property is "separated" from an object? That 
>>>> an object loses a property? That happens all the time.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> arXiv:1312.3775v1 [quant-ph] 13 Dec 2013
>>>>
>>>> Brent
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We know that a molecule's histories can interfere with each other:
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-slit_experiment
>>>
>>> In 2013, the double-slit experiment was successfully performed with 
>>> molecules that each comprised 810 atoms (whose total mass was over 10,000 
>>> atomic 
>>> mass units <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_mass_units>).
>>>
>>>  
>>> Does this mean that a molecule's properties can be separated from itself?
>>>
>>>
>>> That's a non-sequitur.  A double-slit experiment is not the same as a 
>>> Cheshire cat experiment.
>>>
>>> Brent
>>>
>>
>>
>> The same QM principles apply. It's just plain quantum mechanics going on 
>> whether it's a particle 
>>
> >                                                                          
>                                                                             
>       or 
>
>> molecule, or which experiment is being done:
>>
>> *Quantum Cheshire Cat effect may be explained by standard quantum 
>> mechanics.*
>>
>> https://phys.org/news/2015-06-quantum-cheshire-cat-effect-standard.html
>>
>> @philipthrift 
>>
>


The "Cheshire Cat" claim that a property can be separated from the particle 
is just* pseudoscience*, as far as I can tell.

@philipthrift  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/af0de48f-dcd3-4c6f-8dba-8cfe0e831442%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to