Quantum Cheshire Cat effect may be explained by standard quantum mechanics.

https://phys.org/news/2015-06-quantum-cheshire-cat-effect-standard.html

@philipthrift

On Thursday, May 30, 2019 at 1:02:12 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
>
> I wonder if philosophers have noticed that properties can be separated 
> from objects in quantum mechanics, c.f. Cheshire Cat experiments?
>
> Brent
>
> On 5/30/2019 5:50 AM, Tomas Pales wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, May 29, 2019 at 10:15:46 PM UTC+2, Jason wrote: 
>>
>> Appears to predict the arithmetical reality:
>>
>> "There exists, unless I am mistake, an entire world consisting of the 
>> totality of mathematical truths, which is accessible to us only through our 
>> intelligence, just as there exists the world of physical realities; each 
>> one is independent of us, both of them divinely created and appear 
>> different only because of the weakness of our mind; but, for a more 
>> powerful intelligence, they are one and the same thing, whose synthesis is 
>> partially revealed in that marvelous correspondence between abstract 
>> mathematics on the one hand and astronomy and all branches of physics on 
>> the other."
>>
>>
>> https://monoskop.org/images/a/aa/Kurt_G%C3%B6del_Collected_Works_Volume_III_1995.pdf
>>  on 
>> page 323.
>>
>> Jason
>>
>
> In philosophy, the relation between abstract and concrete objects is 
> called "instantiation", for example between the abstract triangle and 
> concrete triangles. It is a relation whereby the abstract object is a 
> property of the concrete objects and the concrete objects are instances of 
> the abstract object. The instantation relation is regarded as primitive, 
> similarly like the composition relation between a collection of objects and 
> the objects in the collection. The instantiation relation may appear more 
> mysterious though, because while it is quite easy to visualize a 
> collection, it is impossible to visualize an abstract object.
>
> Abstract and concrete objects are existentially dependent on each other, 
> because there can be no property without an object that has the property, 
> and there can be no object that has no property.
>   
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/3d92e36d-a075-4a4d-b3ba-0bdc737e0ebe%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to