On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 8:18 AM Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
> The fact that you compare Plotinus ir Proclus to a Caveman shows that you > have not even try to read them Well of course I haven't read them! Unless your field of study is ancient literature and primitive cultures only a fool would take the time to read a 2000 year old book, and the history of ancient wrong ideas is not a field of study I am personally very interested in. *> That is dogmatic thinking I’m afraid. It is “religion” in your > pejorative sense.* Yeah yeah I know, I believe you may have mentioned that before, about 6.03 *10^23 times. But instead of repeating that old stale insult I wish you'd done something original, like answering my question; you can not claim to be able to read every book ever written, so how do you rationally determine which books are worth your time and which books are not? John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv3M0FAZKdeMXoj2NPk5gBqdz6kyndUOXkoq5uv4%3Dg%2BmZA%40mail.gmail.com.
