> On 6 Jun 2019, at 02:47, Lawrence Crowell <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> On Wednesday, June 5, 2019 at 9:30:31 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> 
>> On 4 Jun 2019, at 17:42, John Clark <[email protected] <javascript:>> wrote:
>> 
>> On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 10:55 AM Bruno Marchal <[email protected] 
>> <javascript:>> wrote:
>>  
>> >> you said atheism is just a slight variation of Christianity and believe 
>> >> my saying Aristotle was the worst physicist who ever lived means I have 
>> >> embraced Aristotle's ideas as an act of faith.
>> 
>> > The physics is wrong, which is nice as it means that Aristotle was clear 
>> > enough to be shown wrong.
>> 
>> Aristotelian physics could have been easily disproven even with 2500 year 
>> old technology, and yet for 2000 years any suggestion that it might not be 
>> flawless was met with derision if not violence.
> 
> That is not Aristotle fault, but the fault of abandoning the most fundamental 
> science to “politics”. With the Renaissance, only a part of science has been 
> freed from “authority”.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> Physics would be more advanced today if Aristotle had never been born.  
> 
> That is hard to refute, or to prove.
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> > Criticising the scientifically-minded theology of the greek neoplatonist 
>> > *is* so typical among christians. You really defend them all the time, DE 
>> > FACTO.
>> 
>> The new total is now (6.02*10^23) +2. 
>> 
>> And I've already told you how I figure out which book is most likely to 
>> clear up my confusion of how the world works but you *STILL* haven't said 
>> how you do it.
>> 
>> >> Immortality means never having a last thought and the only way I know how 
>> >> to do that is with infinity.
>> 
>> >That would happen in circular model of time, like in Gödel GR universe.
>> 
>> But the Gödel GR universe is not the one I live in, my universe does not 
>> rotate.
> 
> How do you know that? We don’t have yet a picture of what is beyond the 
> observable universe, nor do we have even a coherent theory of the physical 
> universe. We have to jewels: QM and GR, but they are insistent when taken 
> together, and both would contradict Mechanism (the hypothesis in cognitive 
> science) if taken as the fundamental theory.
> 
> Bruno
> 
> It is unlikely, or at least if the universe rotates is is very small. A 
> rotation frame drags spacetime, and for the Gödel universe that rotates as a 
> stationary set of point then for points removed from the spatial center this 
> frame dragging becomes enormous. There is even an event horizon generated. 
> Also even regions inside the horizon scale have geodesics that will time 
> loop, where in fact the only geodesic that will not time loop is one passing 
> through the center and normal to the spatial surface. This is problematic for 
> the spatial surface at any time can't contain unique Cauchy data. 


To be franc, I have not enough expertise in GR to measure the impact on this. I 
can imagine slowing down the rotation to make the drag as small as possible, 
but that is only a guess. Then, I am not Aristotelian: I don’t believe in what 
I see (take this with some grain of salt).

Bruno

“De mémoire de rose, je n’ai jamais vu mourrir un jardinier” (Fontenelle).





> 
> LC
> 
> <A-map-of-the-future-lightcones-of-the-Goedel-universe.png>
> 
>  
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/c6e796bb-5d97-401a-a977-696dd759d8b7%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/c6e796bb-5d97-401a-a977-696dd759d8b7%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
> <A-map-of-the-future-lightcones-of-the-Goedel-universe.png>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/C731A47E-4B2D-49EE-8089-B96665654AD7%40ulb.ac.be.

Reply via email to