On 8/7/2019 2:56 PM, Philip Thrift wrote:


On Wednesday, August 7, 2019 at 2:59:04 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:



    On 8/7/2019 11:15 AM, Philip Thrift wrote:


    On Wednesday, August 7, 2019 at 1:03:44 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:



        On 8/7/2019 1:08 AM, Philip Thrift wrote:
        On Tuesday, August 6, 2019 at 5:29:04 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:



            On 8/6/2019 11:25 AM, Philip Thrift wrote:


            On Tuesday, August 6, 2019 at 1:00:23 PM UTC-5, Brent
            wrote:



                On 8/6/2019 6:38 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
                If the QC does its task effectively, the output
                basis qbits will be put into definite states,

                Relatively to the observer, but in the global
                state, the observer will inherit the superposition
                state, by linearity of the tensor products and of
                the evolution.

                In something like Shor's algorithm there is only
                one final state with non-vanishing probability. 
                Yet this is the kind of algorithm that Deutsch
                cites as proving there must be many worlds.

                Brent




            That there is a multiplicity of /somethings/

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_histories
            <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_histories>

            is the basis for all semantics of quantum computing (by
            computer scientists) that I have ever seen.

            Same for classical computation...there are lots of
            states or functions.  Did anyone think there had to be
            multiple worlds for the computer to work?

            Brent




        There is classical parallel hardware, e.g. made with
        multiple processors.

        Parallelism in quantum computers is achieved by parallel
        "worlds" or "paths":

        Quantum Path Computing
        - https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.00735
        
<https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F1709.00735&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNFru47zPN3LturOmKgNuixbWCjlHg>

        Quantum circuit dynamics via path integrals: Is there a
        classical action for discrete-time paths?
        -
        https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/aa61ba
        <https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/aa61ba>

        But as you note with scare quotes, calling those "worlds" or 
        "paths" is just metaphorical.  They are not worlds you can
        visit or paths you can take. They are aspects of mathematical
        abstractions.

        Brent


        A “problem of time” in the multiplicative scheme for the
        n-site hopper
        Fay Dowker, Vojtˇech Havlicek, Cyprian Lewandowski, and
        Henry Wilkes
        -
        
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/39d9/11e25b835ce8d34910c0a9e02f22ef8d4c41.pdf
        
<https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/39d9/11e25b835ce8d34910c0a9e02f22ef8d4c41.pdf>
        "Quantum Measure Theory (QMT*) is an approach to quantum
        mechanics,
        based on the path integral, in which quantum theory is
        conceived of as a generalized stochastic process."
        *
        
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/bfda/1caa5afbbd9e2d6dcff5456325b60b64b909.pdf
        
<https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/bfda/1caa5afbbd9e2d6dcff5456325b60b64b909.pdf>

        The sum-over-histories formulation of quantum computing
        - https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0607151
        <https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0607151>

        @philipthrift





    If a multiplicity of somethings isn't present in a quantum
    computer, then how does the speedup occur?

    By not decohering at every bit flip and keeping the single state
    rotating.

    Brent






Then how does an answer come out?

By decoherence at the end.



Like in the solution  here: https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.00735

QPC solves specific instances of simultaneous Diophantine approximation problem (NP-hard) as an important application.

QPC does not explicitly require exponential complexity of resources by combining tensor product space of path histories inherently existing in the physical set-up and path integrals naturally including histories.

Interesting, but looks more aspirational than proven.  It reminds me of attempts to solve NP-hard problems using some analog schemes.

Brent


more here: https://faculty.ozyegin.edu.tr/burhangulbahar/publications/

@philipthrift
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/fa7c599b-01d6-43d0-9bb7-9690eff937b1%40googlegroups.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/fa7c599b-01d6-43d0-9bb7-9690eff937b1%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/54ce01fe-74cb-7b24-f666-2e7267e2294a%40verizon.net.

Reply via email to