> On 26 Aug 2019, at 23:08, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 8/26/2019 5:51 AM, Jason Resch wrote: >> One not necessary, >> >> If every possible mathematical structure exists, then everything (including >> what you might call accidents) is necessary. > > If every possible mathematical structure exists, then "exists" is meaningless > when applied to mathematical structures.
It is more the “every” in “every mathematical structure” which is non sensical … in most set theories. But the theory NF might provides some sense, but I am not sure if that is not a bit ad hoc. Phycialism has the same problem with the notion of “whole”. But it has even bigger problem with the mechanist assumption. Bruno > > Brent > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/2a75505e-2f41-6fa9-3750-55c7cdc890e9%40verizon.net > > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/2a75505e-2f41-6fa9-3750-55c7cdc890e9%40verizon.net?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CE769909-85EE-4ED7-832E-590E0C3F48C8%40ulb.ac.be.
