On Friday, September 13, 2019 at 6:25:43 PM UTC-5, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>
> as far as I can see [MWI is] just an auxiliary set of physical axioms one
> can work with in various ways. I have no idea whether there really are
> 10^{200} versions of me splashed across the type III multiverse.
>
> LC
>
Are there any programs using "MWI axioms" in any computational QM
programming* to do materials science, chemistry, cosmology, etc. that give
them an edge over other methods in terms of making better predictions?
If not, MMI is a waste of time, and *pseudoscience*.
* Computational Quantum Mechanics
http://www-users.york.ac.uk/~mijp1/teaching/3rd_year_CQM/index.shtml
@philipthrift
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/165c50b1-a8b1-4e98-97d0-71f99a18fa61%40googlegroups.com.
