On Friday, September 13, 2019 at 10:32:42 PM UTC-5, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, September 13, 2019 at 6:25:43 PM UTC-5, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>>
>> as far as I can see [MWI is] just an auxiliary set of physical axioms one
>> can work with in various ways. I have no idea whether there really are
>> 10^{200} versions of me splashed across the type III multiverse.
>>
>> LC
>>
>
>
>
> Are there any programs using "MWI axioms" in any computational QM
> programming* to do materials science, chemistry, cosmology, etc. that give
> them an edge over other methods in terms of making better predictions?
>
> If not, MMI is a waste of time, and *pseudoscience*.
>
MMI is the same as MWI: Worlds/Mundos. :)
> * Computational Quantum Mechanics
> http://www-users.york.ac.uk/~mijp1/teaching/3rd_year_CQM/index.shtml
>
> @philipthrift
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/d5736336-d32c-40f4-9659-a36ac7b990fd%40googlegroups.com.
