On 9/16/2019 6:22 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Monday, September 16, 2019 at 5:58:58 AM UTC-6, John Clark wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 4:49 AM Philip Thrift <[email protected]
<javascript:>> wrote:
> "Many Worlds" (as demonstrated via Sean Carroll here)
demonstrates a failure of theoretical physics, or philosophy,
or both.
And I think the above demonstrates a lack of courage to face the
possibility that reality may be structured in ways you do not
like. As Carl Sagan said "/The universe is not required to be in
perfect harmony with human ambition/".
John K Clark
When physics began to give non-intuitive results, in QM
*and* Relativity, people when overboard. Now any patently absurd
result finds its justification among true believers. So what happened
to the (non-covariant)
You need to read this:
http://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2016/08/15/you-should-love-or-at-least-respect-the-schrodinger-equation/
Brent
wf after the measurement? Nothing. Like a horserace when it reaches
conclusion, it's no longer applicable. That simple! The collapse
hypothesis is just a bookkeeping device to get rid of it! AG
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/31aa3956-a0be-af5e-2959-905ef54eb62e%40verizon.net.
