On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 4:51 PM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Monday, September 16, 2019 at 3:54:46 PM UTC-6, John Clark wrote: >> >> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 9:22 AM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> *> When physics began to give non-intuitive results, in QM >>> and Relativity, people when overboard. Now any patently absurd result finds >>> its justification among true believers.* >>> >> >> And in this context "patently absurd" means odd, not logically >> contradictory not paradoxical not contrary to experimental results, just >> odd. But as far as we know there is no law that says nature can't behave in >> ways that humans find odd. >> > > Many "odd" results are now mainstream, but MWI is bridge too far, way too > far IMO. Why don't you just accept that the wf is simply irrelevant after > the measurement occurs like in the horserace example?. Here, there's no > collapse, no many worlds, no need to explain where the energy comes from > which defines these worlds, and so forth? AG > Except that horses and horse races do not interfere (except in Australia, where several jockeys and trainers have recently been suspended for unauthorised interference -- but that is a different matter!) Bruce -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLQotf9XVmTXHaeyXeVeFrd_O__Dw2cZ-bV23uCLXDH-eg%40mail.gmail.com.
