I

On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 10:17, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> On 9/18/2019 3:22 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 08:16, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 9/18/2019 2:58 PM, John Clark wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 4:25 PM 'Brent Meeker'  <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> *> **Haven't you ever awoken from surgery? AG *
>>>
>>> *>> Yes, and I think I was just the same as before and so does everyone
>>> else. But maybe I am fundamentally different. How would I know?*
>>>
>>> >>> You'd ask people who knew you well.
>>>
>>
>> And if you did that you would hear them make noises with their mouth, but
>> whatever consciousness is it certainly isn't those mouth noises. If your
>> lucky you may be able to detect a pattern in those noises that would
>> indicate intelligence, but you would have to make an additional assumption
>> to conclude that also indicated consciousness, namely that consciousness is
>> an inevitable byproduct of intelligence. In the real world everybody makes
>> that assumption a thousand times a day because the alternative is
>> solipsism.
>>
>>
>> They question was whether you could find out you were fundamentally
>> different after an operation.  Not whether or not your friends were
>> conscious.  Saibal said "No." apparently based only on the fact that he
>> couldn't trust introspection.  But in that would equally imply he couldn't
>> tell whether he fundamentally changed from day to day, or minute to minute.
>> Of course nothing can provide certainty, but your friends saying you act
>> differently or you don't would be good evidence.  It's the same level of
>> evidence for thinking one another consciousness, but it's broader since you
>> might be different in some way you were not conscious of.
>>
>
> And if you were different in some way you were  not conscious of, it
> wouldn’t matter.
>
>
> How do you figure that?  Suppose you're a murderous psychopath after the
> operation.   Just because YOU don't remember not being a murderous
> psychopath before, it may still matter.
>

In that case there would be objective evidence of a change and you would be
conscious of this evidence. But if neither you nor anyone else noticed a
change, it wouldn’t matter. For example, if my colour qualia changed every
day, but there was no objective difference and I didn’t notice any
difference, it wouldn’t matter. It could be argued that such a change is
not really a change at all.

> --
Stathis Papaioannou

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAH%3D2ypXvvoGn%3DYvoChSL9B0s3-_HEYBnVvGw1%2BWDFH4s%2B%3D%2BPsg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to