On Friday, September 20, 2019 at 11:22:24 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 19 Sep 2019, at 12:41, Jason Resch <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > > Like Max Tegmark, in "Our Mathematical Universe", who described how > duplication of the person results in an inability to perfectly predict > future outcomes and experiences, in this interview Sean Carroll describes > how even with perfect knowledge of the universe and it's evolution one > could not make future predictions about what one will experience due to > duplication: > > https://youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=TP5W2MG8Jjs&t=1h5m > > Perhaps Carroll's explanation might help others who've struggled to get > past Step 3. > > > Let us pray ... > > > Bruno > > > As Feyerabend saw (and foresaw) science is now religion.
When a scientist proceeds from the mathematics of any theory to any certain ontology of nature, they are being a religious guru, not a scientific one. @philipthrift -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/b4a25e9e-a8b6-423f-ad2b-a3cc2c97bce9%40googlegroups.com.
