On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 6:53 PM Bruce Kellett <[email protected]> wrote:
>*many MWI enthusiasts claim that many worlds does away with Bell > non-locality -- giving a purely local explanation for violations of the > Bell inequalities. This, to my mind, was the last gasp of MWI realists* > MWI realists? How can Many Worlds be Realistic? Realism means things must not only exist but exist in one and only one definite state even when they are not being observed; so whatever else it may be Many Worlds is *not* realistic. And we know for a experimental fact that Bell's inequality is violated, therefore simple algebra forces us to conclude that at least one of the following things must be wrong, perhaps all 3: 1) Realism 2) Superdeterminism 3) Locality Although I can't prove it's wrong I find it almost impossible to believe Superdeterminism is true, but Locality might be. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv3TK_TBEUez4QsXhgP-KRNj3d85yc%2BmALRTrtUGQkQF2Q%40mail.gmail.com.
