On Monday, September 30, 2019 at 9:53:12 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote: > > > > In the case of *Everett'*s relative state, it suggested decoherence and > *quantum > Darwinism *which I think have gone a long way to answering the questions > of preferred pointer states and the Heisenberg cut. > > Brent >
I don't know specifically about Zizek QD, but for Everett's MWI I just haven't seen anything in computational methods/programming of applying quantum theory to actual problems (as is done in computational quantum mechanics, a branch of computational physics) that uses any specifically MWI concepts. (No one has provided a reference. If not, then MWI is just good for telling fairy tales.) So that MWI has "gone a long way to answering the questions" about *anything* quantum seems doubtful. (Do physicists really think that it does?) Sean Carroll's book tour seems like a disaster for physics to me. @phiipthrift -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/6458cf60-beab-4410-a17a-5caf07f594dd%40googlegroups.com.
