On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 9:29 PM John Clark <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 3:34 AM Philip Thrift <[email protected]> > wrote: > > *>>> Other interpretations (but not MWI, as far as I can see) are used in >>>> writing programs for computational QM.* >>> >>> >>> >> Like what? >>> >> >> *> Multiple Histories.* >> > > And Multiple Histories uses path integral formulation and path integral > formulation uses renormalization theory which is entirely in sympathy with > the Shut Up And Calculate Interpretation; it's a wonderful way of getting > the right answer, Feynman won a Nobel Prize for inventing it, but he was > never entirely comfortable with it because it gave no coherent mental > picture. He didn't even try to hide the imperfections in his idea. > And you have a wonderful many-worlds theory that avoids all infinities? And doesn't need renormalization? Bruce -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLRR4ioQmFky74gP8c2w%2BG-%3DkX1d9DyjApda92tpNKDp_A%40mail.gmail.com.
