On Saturday, October 12, 2019 at 2:18:47 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote: > > > > On 10/12/2019 3:41 AM, Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Friday, October 11, 2019 at 9:36:49 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote: >> >> >> >> On 10/11/2019 6:58 PM, Alan Grayson wrote: >> >> >>> But that's not absurd, because it is possible to have a radioactive atom >>> that is isolated from all environment and other degrees of freedom and so >>> it might exist in a superposition. >>> >> >> But if you amplify the micro superposition and throw in a cat, you get an >> absurdity. Maybe Schroedinger was *also* trying to show that the >> interpretation of *micro* superposition is not correct. AG >> >> >> Yes, I think he did. But he was wrong about that. Bohr saved the theory >> by declaring that there was a classical world and a quantum world, which >> worked pretty well because everybody's intuition about the Heisenberg cut >> was about the same. >> >> Brent >> > > I don't see how Bohr saved the theory (of superposition?) by making that > declaration. Isn't there general agreement today that everything is > quantum? AG > > > There is now, but "Shut and calculate" produced huge advancements in > understanding physics, chemistry, and biology and produced the solid-state > electronics revolution - without metaphysics getting in the way. > > Brent >
Where have I introduced metaphysics? If a superposition means that all components are simultaneously realizied, which I presume is Bohr's position, this is where metaphysics has been introduced, unless it can be shown valid. Does double slit interference mean all components are simultaneously realized, which is the road to MW? Why is this interpretation valid? AG -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/df065f0b-105f-47a6-a58b-8953fe57afa6%40googlegroups.com.
