On Saturday, October 12, 2019 at 5:54:31 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote: > > > > On 10/12/2019 2:38 PM, Alan Grayson wrote: > > What is your "quantum interpretation" of this: >>> >>> These hefty molecules (oligotetraphenyl porphyrins enriched with >>> fluoroalkyl-sulfanyl chains) are sent through a 2-slit screen and land on a >>> collection array forming a diffraction pattern (just as photons do). How >>> does the presence of the 2 slits make the interference pattern? What is >>> interfering with what? >>> >> >> *I don't know. **The size of the molecules is irrelevant.** I am willing >> to leave it at that without grandeous interpretations. But since you think >> it means all components are simultaneously realized, even if the particles >> are measured one at the time, with large time delays, what's the logic to >> this conclusion? AG* >> >> >>> (Sabine Hosssenfelder says a particle - and she would have to say this >>> molecule - is in two places at once. But she doesn't have a quantum >>> interpretation. But what would *Vic Stenger* have said? >>> >> > *Stenger found the MWI abhorrent. Don't recall what alternative he > suggested, if any. AG * > > > Vic, liked some form of retro-causation, like Cramer's transactional QM. > > Brent >
Vic wrote *all I've done is to reify Feynman paths in the path integral*. Something like FISH (Feynman Integral Symmetry Hypothesis [Huw Price, Ken Wharton]). @philithrift -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/c424218f-8612-4d1d-b6cc-5f5112cda8cb%40googlegroups.com.
