On 10/22/2019 4:49 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
It can be proved that we cannot explain (or prove the existence) of a universal machinery without assuming one, so we cannot do better.
But that's equally true of primary matter, ideas, or whatever your fundamental ontology is. It's just a consequence of taking it as fundamental. If it had an explanation or proof it wouldn't be fundamental. So it's not some profound evidence for your theory.
Brent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/4b9e2247-1e27-3ec3-63e4-a38523362a0d%40verizon.net.
