On 10/28/2019 3:27 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:

    But nobody looks at the C60s.  The interference pattern disappears
    anyway.  The trouble with the interpretation you cite is that it
    depends on an ill defined process called "looking at it".

    Brent


Let me introduce you to a familiar concept in QM; observation! It can be an instrument as Feynman states. If you OBSERVE a C60, won't the interference disappear?

But also if you don't observe them, which is not "like any other particle".

Brent

I assume it would if it behaves like any other particle in a slit experiment. Isn't the notable thing about a C60, is the manifestation of interference? AG

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/1bed371e-89f2-b691-48c4-e945dc1ad2d7%40verizon.net.

Reply via email to