On 10/27/2019 3:41 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


On Sunday, October 27, 2019 at 4:27:09 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:



    On 10/27/2019 2:24 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


    On Sunday, October 27, 2019 at 2:52:01 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:



        On 10/26/2019 11:43 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
        Here's what I understand about an electron in the double
        slit experiment. It doesn't occupy two locations
        simultaneously as a particle. Rather, when *not* observed it
        behaves like a wave, goes through both slits, and interferes
with itself. When observed, it behaves as a particle.

        There's your problem.  You're insisting that the electron is
        changing around because it "behaves" differently.  The
        behavior is in your interpretation.  It's not in the
        mathematics.  So the fact that it seems to jump around in
        ontology is the fault of your interpretation trying to impose
        a medieval idea of substance.


    And your interpretation is that the mathematics says the electron
    has two positions or paths simultaneously, and goes through both
    slits?

    The wf goes thru both slits.


That's more or less what I said. AG


    Where does the mathematics assert that unintelligible claim?
    Waves can go through both slits, but not particles.

    In your classical world view.


Not necessarily classical, but rather interpreting the "particle" as a wave when we don't look; a quantum pov. My interpretation explains why interference disappears in which-way experiment,

Your interpretation being what exactly?  Does it work for the Buckyball C60 experiment?

Brent

but what the hell, we can forget about that, and adopt an unintelligible pov.  AG


    Brent

    And here I thought you'd appreciate my interpretation. AG



        Now please explain the form of the wf in S cat experiment,
        applying decoherence before and after it completes, while
        the box is closed. TIA, AG

        There's in no "before and after it completes".  The process
        of transition from undecayed to decayed is continuous, at
        least that's the MWI picture.  When you open the box (or even
        earlier) your brain becomes correlated, via decoherence, with
        one or the other of the branches of the wf.

        Brent

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
    Google Groups "Everything List" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
    send an email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
    To view this discussion on the web visit
    
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/caa65f7b-2cbd-4597-a557-c24adaff5cba%40googlegroups.com
    
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/caa65f7b-2cbd-4597-a557-c24adaff5cba%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/e1c3d3a1-e0f3-448c-b5f6-fba3a09ebd2a%40googlegroups.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/e1c3d3a1-e0f3-448c-b5f6-fba3a09ebd2a%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/78a1517b-fbcc-5fe4-fb03-e5be054f8337%40verizon.net.

Reply via email to