On Friday, January 31, 2020 at 5:02:52 PM UTC-7, Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Friday, January 31, 2020 at 4:00:51 PM UTC-7, John Clark wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 1:18 PM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> *> Why difficult? I'm just pointing out an inconvenient fact; namely, if >>> you use the CMBR as a clock (inconvenient to be sure since the temperature >>> decline of the CMBR is exceedingly slow), simultaneity for all observers in >>> all galaxies exists to one part in 100,000. What are the implications? AG* >> >> >> If you are heading for the Andromeda Galaxy at 99.999% the speed of light >> then to you the CMBR would not look even remotely symmetrical, one >> hemisphere would look much brighter than the other, which would indicate >> that you and everything in your spaceship, including your clock and your >> brain, were moving at a very different speed than most of the matter in the >> universe. But so what? Time dilation would still be in effect, when you >> used your telescope to look at the Earth (which happens to be moving at a >> speed closer to the average speed of matter) you'd see things back on Earth >> were moving at only 0.4472% the speed they are on your spaceship (assuming >> 99.999% of light speed). And when observers on Earth look at you they'd see >> that you and everything on your spaceship were were moving at only 0.4472% >> the speed they are on Earth. Both would see the other moving slowly. And >> none of this has anything whatsoever to do with the CMBR, both see that it >> takes the other 237 seconds to do things that only takes them one second to >> do. As I said before this is odd but not a logical paradox because of the >> disagreement among observers over the meaning of "now". This is explained >> in more detail in the videos on the Twin Paradox that I recommended >> yesterday, the ones you refused to look at because you thought they were >> irrelevant. >> >> John K Clark >> > > How about telling me something I don't already know, like why MUST > everything happen, that CAN happen? I won't waste time reading your > articles. AG >
I'll view your article if they give a clear explanation of the breakdown in simultaneity, when each observer sees the (other) traveling clock having a different "now". AG -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/811329cb-7732-4f47-9273-657da33b6964%40googlegroups.com.
