On Friday, January 31, 2020 at 5:24:07 PM UTC-7, Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Friday, January 31, 2020 at 5:02:52 PM UTC-7, Alan Grayson wrote: >> >> >> >> On Friday, January 31, 2020 at 4:00:51 PM UTC-7, John Clark wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 1:18 PM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> *> Why difficult? I'm just pointing out an inconvenient fact; namely, if >>>> you use the CMBR as a clock (inconvenient to be sure since the temperature >>>> decline of the CMBR is exceedingly slow), simultaneity for all observers >>>> in >>>> all galaxies exists to one part in 100,000. What are the implications? AG* >>> >>> >>> If you are heading for the Andromeda Galaxy at 99.999% the speed of >>> light then to you the CMBR would not look even remotely symmetrical, one >>> hemisphere would look much brighter than the other, which would indicate >>> that you and everything in your spaceship, including your clock and your >>> brain, were moving at a very different speed than most of the matter in the >>> universe. But so what? Time dilation would still be in effect, when you >>> used your telescope to look at the Earth (which happens to be moving at a >>> speed closer to the average speed of matter) you'd see things back on Earth >>> were moving at only 0.4472% the speed they are on your spaceship (assuming >>> 99.999% of light speed). And when observers on Earth look at you they'd see >>> that you and everything on your spaceship were were moving at only 0.4472% >>> the speed they are on Earth. Both would see the other moving slowly. And >>> none of this has anything whatsoever to do with the CMBR, both see that it >>> takes the other 237 seconds to do things that only takes them one second to >>> do. As I said before this is odd but not a logical paradox because of the >>> disagreement among observers over the meaning of "now". This is explained >>> in more detail in the videos on the Twin Paradox that I recommended >>> yesterday, the ones you refused to look at because you thought they were >>> irrelevant. >>> >>> John K Clark >>> >> >> How about telling me something I don't already know, like why MUST >> everything happen, that CAN happen? I won't waste time reading your >> articles. AG >> > > I'll view your articleS if they give a clear explanation of the breakdown > in simultaneity, when each observer sees the (other) traveling clock having > a different "now". AG >
The issue of the CMB has nothing to do with the Twin Paradox. I was just postulating the IF the CMB can be used as clock, there seems to be a time defined for the entire universe, as well as absolute rest, contrary to the claims of relativity. AG -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/1038918e-5108-4d2d-af66-fcb7567c20ce%40googlegroups.com.
