On Sunday, June 7, 2020 at 5:16:33 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> But collapsing or not remains relevant, to make sense of the behaviour of 
> single particle, or more generally to get some meaning of the relative 
> probabilities, experimentally, or in arithmetic.
>
> Bruno
>

 

There are so many "mechanisms" so many people have come up with over many 
decades now to "interpret" these "relative probabilities" that have been 
experimentally recored.

Sean Carroll has his "many worlds"

or (another "possibility"):

The offer wave going out in all directions and the many confirmation waves 
returning are a sort of subset of the infinite number of virtual photons 
traveling all possible paths between emitters and absorbers in Feynman's 
"sum-over-paths" path-integral formulation of quantum mechanics. Kastner 
proposes to regard the outgoing offer wave and many incoming confirmation 
waves as "possible 
<https://www.informationphilosopher.com/freedom/possibilism.html>" 
transactions, only one of which indeterministically 
<https://www.informationphilosopher.com/freedom/indeterminacy.html> becomes 
"actual."

Kastner is a possibilist 
<https://www.informationphilosopher.com/freedom/possibilism.html> who 
argues that OWs and CWs are possibilities that are "real." She says that 
they are less real than actual empirically measurable events, but more real 
than an idea or concept in a person's mind. She suggests the alternate term 
"potentia," Aristotle's that she found Heisenberg had cited. For Kastner, 
the possibilities are physically real as compared to merely conceptually 
possible ideas that are consistent with physical law (for example, David 
Lewis <https://www.informationphilosopher.com/solutions/philosophers/lewis/>' 
"possible worlds." But she says the "possibilities" described by offer and 
confirmation waves are "sub-empirical" and pre-spatiotemporal (i.e., they 
have not shown up as *actual* in spacetime). She calls these "incipient 
transactions."

...

https://www.informationphilosopher.com/solutions/scientists/kastner/ 
<https://www.informationphilosopher.com/solutions/scientists/kastner/#:~:text=Ruth%20Kastner%20is%20a%20physicist,possibilist%20extension%20of%20John%20G.&text=Cramer%20has%20explored%20the%20radical,backwards%20in%20time%20(retrocausality).>

@philipthrift

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/fbf449c4-3051-44c8-861c-b5fcbf26ab62o%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to