On 6/25/2020 8:07 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
From your irreducible material universe in which you seem to believe?
Where did I say "irreducible"? I'm not in the belief business. I'm
in the finding out business.
A scientist can only propose a theory, and means of verification, and
a finite number of evidences for it. Someone doubting the interest of
the theory must either refute it, or find something simpler, or
something with wider range of explanations. I think we agree on all this.
No we don't. It's not sufficient to be simpler unless it also has the
same or greater scope of predictions that are at least as accurate.
"Explanations" are a dime dozen. Prediction is the gold standard.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/569d6e0d-458a-ede0-84b0-aeb4af6923b3%40verizon.net.
